A step-by-step way to work
Start from the decision, not the data
Tell AI what decision or question the dashboard serves; that constrains what belongs on it.
Draft the queries per tile
Have it write the SQL behind each metric (and verify it, as with any AI SQL).
Get visualisation suggestions
Ask which chart type fits each metric and why — AI is reasonable on chart-to-data fit.
Write the plain-English caption
Have it draft the 'what this tells you / what to do if it moves' note for each tile.
Cut ruthlessly yourself
AI will happily fill a dashboard; you decide what to leave off so the signal stays clear.
Real prompts, and what good output looks like
I'm showing weekly active users, retention by cohort, and the share of revenue by plan tier. What chart type for each, and why?
Weekly active users → line chart: shows trend over time at a glance.
Retention by cohort → cohort/triangle heatmap: designed to show how each signup cohort decays over weeks.
Revenue share by plan tier → stacked bar over time (not a pie): a pie hides change; stacked bars show both share and trend.
Avoid a pie for the third — you'll want to see the mix move week to week.
A prompt you can reuse
Fill in the highlighted parts and paste it into your AI tool of choice. Edit the output — it's a starting point, not a finished answer.
Help me build a dashboard. Start from the decision it serves, then the tiles. This dashboard helps [who] decide [what decision/question]. Candidate metrics I'm considering: [list them] My data: [tables and key columns] Please: 1. Tell me which candidate metrics actually serve that decision — and which to cut as noise/vanity. 2. For the keepers, draft the SQL behind each (explain it so I can verify). 3. Suggest the right chart type for each and why. 4. Draft a one-line 'what this tells you / what to do if it moves' caption per tile.
What AI gets wrong here
Cluttered, vanity-heavy dashboards
AI will build whatever metrics you name, including ones that don't drive a decision.
Unverified tile queries
Every AI-written query can carry the usual SQL traps (wrong joins, double-counts).
Pretty over clear
AI may suggest flashy charts (pies, gauges) that obscure the data.
AI is a real time-saver for the build — queries and chart choices — but the discipline of a good dashboard is subtraction: keeping only what informs a decision. That editorial call, and the responsibility for what a viewer will conclude, stays with you. A clean dashboard of the right three metrics beats an AI-assembled wall of twenty.